Interested in watching this video? You have two options:
This video is part of the SER Conference Library. If you want to learn more about this resource please see this guide.
You can purchase a pass for this video on our website.
Already purchased access to this video, or want to redeem credit for a new order? Just enter your order number or email below:
Sign in below to get unrestricted access:
Authors:
Reuben Thifhulufhelwi
Publication Date:
2019
Abstract/Summary:
Learning processes in environmental management are often oriented to change and transformation and frequently involve the emergence of new forms of human activity. Nevertheless, little is known about how such change can be supported, especially in non-formal learning processes. We report on insights from the natural resource management (NRM) resilience building project in the highly biodiverse Legalameetse nature reserve in Limpopo province, South Africa. The paper explores how the use of cultural historic activity theory (CHAT) can mediate transformative learning for supporting co-management of protected areas. This paper reveals how deep historic injustices such as colonization and apartheid regimes have eroded the custodianship of NRM from local land users and communities in South Africa. The investigative question was how can the use of CHAT, in an expansive learning process support people to collectively (re)conceptualize and address the intricate interplay of social, economic, political, and cultural factors that drive environmental degradation? Guided by systemic thinking and sociocultural traditions of CHAT, the paper shares novel ways of mediating learning processes with communities that have successfully (re)claimed their land and that are learning to co-manage it with government agencies for conservation and livelihood benefits. In conclusion, the paper argues for developing and using mediation tools that recognize deep socio-cultural and historical knowledge as key drivers in developing sustainable NRM practices for resilient landscapes and livelihoods. Furthermore, developing and using mediation tools should be conceived not only as an interpretive process, but also as collaborative authoring of events and frameworks for understanding socio-ecological complexity.
Resource Type:
Audio/Video, Conference Presentation, SER2019
Source:
Society for Ecological Restoration